The reason for this is economic and administrative efficiency: while an insurer may be able to track recovery from the party responsible for an accident or its policyholder, this is an expensive administrative procedure. The Knock for Knock agreement simplifies debt collection between insurers and, over time, allocates costs fairly to insurers. A formal agreement between the insured and the insurer in which coverage is agreed. As a rule, an insurance contract is concluded on the basis of a written request or declaration in return for an insurance plan and the wording of the policy An agreement between some insurers regarding motor vehicle rights, under which each insurer pays the repair costs of its own customers without seeking to recover from the insurer of the indebted party “Knock for Knock” is also used in a certain analog sense, for example, the following, quoted in the “Law at War”, of the US Army website : Knock-for-Knock Agreement is not a regulatory requirement, but rather an understanding between insurers. The agreement was drafted by the General Insurance Council, a sectoral body representing all non-life insurance undertakings. Thus, each insurer signs a knock-for-knock agreement with all other insurers and does so to avoid unnecessary litigation and delays by taking the case to court for civil liability policy. However, knock for knock agreements between insurers have been criticized as unfair to the party who is not responsible for an accident. If an insurer pays, for reasons of administrative ease, for compensation for damage to the car of its policyholder instead of suing the person responsible for the accident for all relevant costs, an actual claim is recorded against the insurance file of that policyholder. In this way, knock for knock agreements can lead policyholders to unexpectedly find that they face higher premiums when extending their insurance, regardless of who is liable for an accident in which they participated. This term, when used, refers to a contractual agreement between insurance companies where they do not take legal action to collect rights against each other in order to avoid costly legal bills. Losses, no matter what, are paid as part of the policy that keeps any insurance company without borders.
Its only advantages for the customer are that it tends to speed up the claims process. In some cases, your excess policy can be recovered. Be careful, however, of the extension if you have not had a fault to ensure that you continue to receive your bonus without entitlement. The answer lies in a little-read clause in your household insurance, and what is called the “Knock for Knock” practice. This is because, to claim third parties, you have to bring the crazy person to justice, which could be a long and expensive process. Insurers also know this and therefore prefer to pay for damages through their own claims coverage rather than withdrawing the insurer from which the insured customer is liable to third-party insurance. .